Question

Consider the following statements relating to the level of poker play of four players P, Q, R and S.
I. P always beats Q
II. R always beats S
III. S loses to P only sometimes
IV. R always loses to Q

Which of the following can be logically inferred from the above statements?
(i) P is likely to beat all the three other players
(ii) S is the absolute worst player in the set

Choose one option
Official answer and solution
Official answer
D
From
Official GATE 2016 answer key

Solution

Evaluate the transitive and intransitive relationships given by the four poker statements.

List the pairwise relationship facts:

  • Statement I: PP always beats QQ (P>QP > Q)
  • Statement II: RR always beats SS (R>SR > S)
  • Statement IV: RR always loses to QQ, meaning QQ always beats RR (Q>RQ > R)
    Combining these three: PP beats QQ, QQ beats RR, and RR beats SS (P>Q>R>SP > Q > R > S in deterministic pairwise matchups).

Now examine Statement III: 'S loses to P only sometimes'.
This means that SS does not always lose to PP; in fact, SS wins against PP at least some of the time (or even most of the time).

Because SS can beat PP, the relation is not strictly transitive across the set of players:

  • (i) 'P is likely to beat all the three other players' cannot be inferred because PP does not reliably beat SS.
  • (ii) 'S is the absolute worst player in the set' cannot be inferred because SS beats PP (who beats everyone else in direct matches) a significant portion of the time.

Therefore, neither (i) nor (ii) can be logically inferred.

Final answer

D

Common trap

Assuming transitivity from P>Q>R>SP > Q > R > S and ignoring Statement III which introduces an intransitive loop where SS defeats PP.

The answer is the one in the official GATE answer key. The solution is this site's own explanation.

Source

Paper
GATE 2016 Computer Science and Information Technology (CS) Session 1
Question
8 of 65, printed as GA Q.8
Section
General Aptitude

Report an error in this question

GATE questions are the work of the organising institutes. This site is independent and is not affiliated with them.