Question
Consider the following relation on subsets of the set of integers between 1 and 2014. For two distinct subsets and of we say if the minimum element in the symmetric difference of the two sets is in .
Consider the following two statements:
: There is a subset of that is larger than every other subset.
: There is a subset of that is smaller than every other subset.
Which one of the following is CORRECT?
Official answer and solution
- Official answer
- A
- From
- Official GATE 2014 answer key
Solution
Analyze the ordering relation on the finite power set P(S) to identify the unique maximal and minimal subsets.
-
Relation Definition:
For distinct subsets :Note that if , then . This defines a strict total linear order (anti-lexicographic order) on the power set .
-
Candidate for Smallest Subset (S2):
- Consider the set itself (the entire set).
- For any other subset , .
- Since , the minimum element of is an element of , which means .
- Therefore, by definition, holds for every subset .
- Thus, is smaller than every other subset of . Statement is TRUE.
-
Candidate for Largest Subset (S1):
- Consider the empty set .
- For any non-empty subset , .
- The minimum element of is obviously an element of , so .
- By definition, holds for every non-empty subset .
- This means that every other subset is smaller than , which equivalently means that is larger than every other subset! Statement is TRUE.
-
Conclusion:
Both S1 and S2 are true, corresponding to option (A).
A
Intuitively expecting emptyset to be the smallest and S to be the largest; the definition puts the subset containing the minimum differing element as the smaller one, reversing the usual subset inclusion intuition.
The answer is the one in the official GATE answer key. The solution is this site's own explanation.
Source
- Paper
- GATE 2014 Computer Science and Information Technology (CS) Session 2
- Question
- 60 of 65, printed as CS Q.50
- Section
- Computer Science and Information Technology
Report an error in this question
GATE questions are the work of the organising institutes. This site is independent and is not affiliated with them.